{"id":1210357,"date":"2022-09-24T18:19:54","date_gmt":"2022-09-24T18:19:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ghanamma.com\/2022\/09\/24\/youtube-takes-on-tiktok-spotify-adds-audiobooks-bereal-takes-a-dive\/"},"modified":"2022-09-24T18:19:54","modified_gmt":"2022-09-24T18:19:54","slug":"youtube-takes-on-tiktok-spotify-adds-audiobooks-bereal-takes-a-dive","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ghanamma.com\/2022\/09\/24\/youtube-takes-on-tiktok-spotify-adds-audiobooks-bereal-takes-a-dive\/","title":{"rendered":"YouTube takes on TikTok, Spotify adds audiobooks, BeReal takes a dive \u2022"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n

Welcome back to This Week in Apps, the weekly series that recaps the latest in mobile OS news, mobile applications and the overall app economy.<\/p>\n

Global app spending reached $65 billion in the first half of 2022, up only slightly from the $64.4 billion during the same period in 2021, as hypergrowth fueled by the pandemic has slowed down. But overall, the app economy is continuing to grow, having produced a record number of downloads and consumer spending across both the iOS and Google Play stores combined in 2021, according to the latest year-end reports. Global spending across iOS and Google Play last year was $133 billion, and consumers downloaded 143.6 billion apps.<\/p>\n

This Week in Apps offers a way to keep up with this fast-moving industry in one place with the latest from the world of apps, including news, updates, startup fundings, mergers and acquisitions, and much more.<\/p>\n

Do you want This Week in Apps in your inbox every Saturday? Sign up here: techcrunch.com\/newsletters<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Now is the time to build new social apps<\/h3>\n

Today\u2019s dominant social networks are losing their grip on the youngest generation of internet users. Last month, we looked at how one of the world\u2019s largest social networks, Facebook, had begun to fade in relevance \u2014 and was losing its position in the App Store\u2019s Top Charts, as a result \u2014 while young people turned to apps like BeReal and TikTok instead. But there still seems to be this sentiment among a number of app makers that trying to compete in social is a lost cause. That\u2019s not necessarily true anymore. Just as Instagram grew under Facebook\u2019s shadow, there\u2019s room for other apps to grow outside TikTok \u2014 an app that is today seen as more of an entertainment platform than a place to connect with close friends (though TikTok is pushing to change that).<\/p>\n

BeReal\u2019s rise is proof that alternative networks that prioritize real-world friendships can still find traction. In fact, younger people are hungry for a place to be themselves and keep up with their friends outside of feeds filled with creator content and targeted ads.<\/p>\n

But BeReal\u2019s long-term success is not a given at this point, even though the app currently has established itself as a leader in the App Store\u2019s Top Five, and is often the No. 1 app, at times, in global markets. That\u2019s a good start, but BeReal has yet to figure out key parts of its business, like monetization, and is struggling to communicate both with its own users and the wider public.<\/p>\n

For instance, when the app went down this week, the company vaguely tweeted a statement \u2014 \u201cyup, we\u2019re on it\u201d \u2014 that largely left its user base in the dark about what was going on. By comparison, when Instagram experienced a briefer, partial outage the following day, it spelled out that it understood the situation by noting that some people were \u201chaving trouble accessing Instagram,\u201d and that it was working to fix things as quickly as possible and to stay tuned. It also added the #instagramdown hashtag to increase the visibility of its post.<\/p>\n

The company is behaving poorly for an app in its position. There are times to be cute and cheeky with social media posts \u2014 but those times are not amid outages and other serious platform issues. BeReal\u2019s misstep with users will be forgiven for now. But as the company scales, the team\u2019s inability to communicate with its own users and the media could become a larger problem.<\/p>\n

To date, BeReal has only offered off-the-record briefings with select press. It doesn\u2019t have an in-house comms team. It doesn\u2019t pitch or post to a blog to keep its users updated. It doesn\u2019t even publish useful release notes on the App Store.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

App Store release notes \u2014 so helpful! Image Credits:<\/strong> BeReal<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

And BeReal couldn\u2019t respond to a series of simple questions about its outage \u2014 like what caused it or how widespread it was. This begs the question as to how the company will handle a more serious crisis \u2014 like a hack, data breach or another incident involving bad actors on its platform. It can get away with this for now \u2014 but not forever. Gaining the top spot on the App Store as Gen Z\u2019s favorite social app also comes with responsibilities, and so far, BeReal has been dropping the ball on that front.<\/p>\n

Remember that this is no longer some scrappy app maker, paying college students to download its new toy. The company\u00a0raised a $30 million Series A, led by Andreessen Horowitz and Accel, followed by a Series B from DST Global, valuing the startup, pre-money\u00a0at $600+ million. It\u2019s time for BeReal to grow up.<\/p>\n

BeReal\u2019s missteps, however, could open the door to more social app newcomers who offer a service that\u2019s built on more than a gimmick.<\/p>\n

For what it\u2019s worth, TikTok has realized this market still has tons of unclaimed territory. Last weekend, it rolled out its shameless BeReal clone, TikTok Now, as a standalone app in global markets outside the U.S. The new app already found some traction, moving into the Top 100 social apps on iPhone in five markets, and the Top 500 in 38 within roughly a day\u2019s time. A couple of days later, it ranked in the Top 10 social apps in 39 countries and the Top 100 in 24. And it presents almost nothing new to users beyond a TikTok-produced version of the BeReal format with added support for video. (And maybe less horrible-looking selfies?)<\/p>\n

If a complete knock-off like TikTok Now can climb the charts, imagine what a truly unique app could do. (Or even a newcomer that simply revives older social networking concepts for this modern era. Time to bring back Path?) There are few times when it would make sense to build a social app. But as the old guard is inching toward retirement, that time is surely now.<\/p>\n

YouTube takes on TikTok with creator ad share for Shorts<\/h3>\n
\"\"<\/p>\n

Image Credits:<\/strong> YouTube<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

YouTube has stopped messing around. It\u2019s taking on the TikTok threat in a way that not only benefits its competitive position in the short-form video market, but one that allows it to expand its ad load across a new surface. This week, the company announced Shorts creators will now qualify for its revamped YouTube Partner Program, which allows them to earn ad revenue from YouTube.<\/p>\n

The existing Partner Program for long-form video requires YouTubers to have 1,000 subscribers and 4,000 watch hours. This won\u2019t change. But starting in early 2023, creators will be able to apply to the program if they meet a new Shorts-specific threshold of 1,000 subscribers and 10 million Shorts views over 90 days. As members of the Partner Program, these creators will earn 45% of ad revenue from their videos. (Ads will run in-between Shorts and the money is pooled. Creators keep 45% of the revenue from the amount allocated to them, not to licensing. Some creators don\u2019t think<\/a> that\u2019s a great deal, however.)<\/p>\n

The changes are designed to onboard creators gaining traction or going viral on Shorts, whether it\u2019s with original content or clipping from other people\u2019s videos (which is totally okay with YouTube).<\/p>\n

To further sweeten the pot, YouTube also introduced Creator Music \u2014 an online service where creators can choose music for their videos by examining the costs associated with licensing specific tunes or they can browse songs they can use without paying upfront. The latter opts them into a rev share with music rights holders.<\/p>\n

Spotify gets into audiobooks<\/h3>\n
\"\"<\/p>\n

Image Credits:<\/strong> Spotify<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Spotify believes audiobooks could be its next big revenue driver, so on Tuesday, the company launched its debut audiobook catalog in the U.S. with somewhere north of 300,000 titles to start. Initially, the selections in the app will be recommended by Spotify editors. But over time, the company says it plans to expand audiobooks to other markets, grow its selection and begin to use algorithmic recommendations to suggest books to users, as it does now with its other audio formats.<\/p>\n

The company had earlier pointed to research indicating the audiobook industry is expected to grow from $3.3 billion as of 2020 to $15 billion by 2027. It forecast its audiobook sales could reach a gross margin of above 40%.<\/p>\n

The books are found in a new Audiobooks hub in the app and are purchased \u00e0 la carte at variable pricing \u2014 a move Spotify believes will allow lesser-known authors to find an audience. And notably, they\u2019re not being sold via in-app purchases.<\/p>\n

Instead, the app offers previews of the book\u2019s content for free, but users will be directed to Spotify\u2019s website to complete their purchases. Afterward, the purchased audiobook will be unlocked in the app and saved to the user\u2019s library.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s worth noting Spotify\u2019s ability to avoid in-app purchases on iOS follows\u00a0a policy change Apple announced\u00a0back in March which focused on \u201creader\u201d apps \u2014 meaning those designed to provide access to digital content like music, books, videos or magazines. Apple said these apps could now use external links, if approved. Google, meanwhile, began piloting third-party billing earlier this year,\u00a0with Spotify as its first customer.<\/p>\n

Spotify didn\u2019t clarify its agreements with the app stores, but says its model is \u201ccompliant.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Image Credits:<\/strong> Spotify<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Meta is sued for tracking users with a workaround to ATT<\/h3>\n

A new class action lawsuit claims Meta circumvented Apple\u2019s App Tracking Transparency (ATT) privacy protections to track its users, even after those users denied the company permission to do so via the ATT prompt. The plaintiffs allege Meta had followed its users\u2019 online activity by injecting JavaScript into the websites they visited when using Facebook\u2019s in-app web browser. This was effectively a way to work around the protections ATT supposedly puts into place, the suit alleges. Meta has denied the claims, calling the lawsuit \u201cwithout merit.\u201d<\/p>\n

Users rightly believe that when they opt out of tracking on iOS, they simply won\u2019t be tracked. But that\u2019s not necessarily true. Companies had been looking for workarounds to ATT since it was announced, Meta included.<\/p>\n

This isn\u2019t the first time an app has been suspected of using the browser to track users without their consent. This summer, TikTok was also accused of injecting code to track users\u2019 keystrokes when users visited third-party websites from within the TikTok app. The company denied those claims as well, saying the app\u2019s code was used for debugging, troubleshooting and performance monitoring, and for protecting users against spam and other threats.<\/p>\n

The case will likely be highly technical but will be an interesting one to follow as the extent of ATT\u2019s ability to protect consumers is decided.<\/p>\n

Platforms: Apple<\/h3>\n
\"iPhone<\/p>\n

Image Credits:<\/strong> Matthew Panzarino \/ <\/p>\n<\/div>\n