\n
\n 7 April 2022<\/time>\n <\/p>\nArchie is found unconscious by his mother after an incident at their home in Essex. He is taken to Southend Hospital.<\/p>\n\n \n<\/picture>\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n 8 April<\/time>\n <\/p>\nArchie is transferred to The Royal London Hospital in Whitechapel where he has been treated ever since.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n 26 April<\/time>\n <\/p>\nThe NHS trust that runs the Royal London starts High Court proceedings by asking for Archie to undergo brain stem testing.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n 13 May<\/time>\n <\/p>\nMrs Justice Arbuthnot rules that brain stem testing should be carried out.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n 16 May<\/time>\n <\/p>\nTwo specialists try to administer brain stem function tests, but they are unable to as Archie did not respond to a peripheral nerve stimulation test, a precursor to the brain stem test.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n 25 May<\/time>\n <\/p>\nA hearing is held to decide if further MRI scans should be conducted. Archie\u2019s parents did not consent on the basis that moving Archie could harm him.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n 27 May<\/time>\n <\/p>\nThe court approves further MRI scans, which are carried out on 31 May.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n 6-8 June<\/time>\n <\/p>\nA final hearing is held to hear evidence on whether Archie\u2019s life-support treatment should continue.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n 13 June<\/time>\n <\/p>\nThe High Court judge rules that Archie is \u201cdead\u201d based on MRI scan results and that treatment could be withdrawn.<\/p>\n\n \n \n Image caption<\/span> Hollie Dance, Archie\u2019s mother, outside the High CourtImage copyright by<\/span> PA\n
\n 20 June<\/time>\n <\/p>\nThe family ask the Court of Appeal to reconsider the case.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n 29 June<\/time>\n <\/p>\nThe Court of Appeal says that a new hearing to determine Archie\u2019s best interests should take place.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n 11 July<\/time>\n <\/p>\nA new hearing is held in the High Court with evidence given before Mr Justice Hayden.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n 15 July<\/time>\n <\/p>\nMr Justice Hayden rules that life-support treatment should end, saying continuing it is \u201cfutile\u201d.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n 25 July<\/time>\n <\/p>\nThree Court of Appeal judges support the High Court ruling that treatment can end.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n 28 July<\/time>\n <\/p>\nThe Supreme Court rules out intervening in the case and supports the Court of Appeal ruling.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n 29 July<\/time>\n <\/p>\nThe family make an application to the United Nations.<\/p>\n\n \n \n Image caption<\/span> Archie\u2019s mother and father, Paul Battersbee, outside the Royal London HospitalImage copyright by<\/span> PA\n
\n 30 July<\/time>\n <\/p>\nA UN Committee writes to the UK government asking for a delay in withdrawing treatment while they consider the case.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n 31 July<\/time>\n <\/p>\nThe government asks for an urgent hearing to review the case.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n 1 August<\/time>\n <\/p>\nThe Court of Appeal refuses to postpone withdrawal of treatment until the UN can hear the case.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n 2 August<\/time>\n <\/p>\nThe Supreme Court refuse the family\u2019s application for permission to appeal the Court of Appeal ruling.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n 3 August<\/time>\n <\/p>\nEuropean Court of Human Rights refuses an application from the family to postpone the withdrawal of Archie\u2019s life support.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n 4 August<\/time>\n <\/p>\nArchie\u2019s parents make a legal application to move their son to a hospice for end of life care.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n 5 August<\/time>\n <\/p>\nA High Court judge rules that Archie cannot be moved to a hospice for withdrawal of treatment.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n 6 August<\/time>\n <\/p>\nArchie passes away at the Royal London Hospital after treatment is withdrawn in line with court rulings about his best interests. Members of his family are at his bedside.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n