General News of Tuesday, 5 September 2017
A Senior Research fellow with the Centre for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana) says last Thursday’s statement by the Ghana Journalist Association (GJA) is regrettable.
Kojo Pumpuni Asante, says the Association’s statements about investigative journalists hounding local businesses has gotten anti-corruption groups worried because the timing “is completely regrettable and the statement is unfounded in many ways.”
His comments follow a similar statement from the anti-corruption civil society Tuesday in which it disagreed with the GJA for cautioning investigative journalists against trying local businesses and businessmen in the media.
Even though the GJA statement mentioned no name or media house the timing of the release was curious especially when Joy FM’s investigative journalist Manasseh Azure Awune had only recently began its latest exposé on questionable contracts signed between the erstwhile government and the Jospong Group of Companies.
Speaking on the matter, Mr Asante said the statement issued by the GJA put the credibility of the Association at stake.
“There is some contestation as to whether this is the GJA as a group or it is just the President. Whatever it is, it goes with the GJA’s name and for their reputation and restoring their own credibility, other members of the GJA should come out and speak,”
He said given the number of days passed and with lots of public criticisms, it is only fair for the Association to come out and defend itself.
Mr Asante believes it is critical that GJA comes out to support the country’s fight against corruption.
“We need the GJA to be strong and support investigative journalists who do all this work at the detriment of their lives to save the national purse,” he said.
Below is the statement by the anti-corruption civil society
ANTI-CORRUPTION CIVIL SOCIETY DISAGREES WITH GJA
The Ghana Integrity Initiative (GII), Ghana Anti–Corruption Coalition (GACC), Ghana Center for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana), Citizens’ Movement against Corruption (CMaC), and Africa Center for International Law and Accountability (ACILA) express deep disappointment with the statement issued by the Ghana Journalists Association (GJA) on 31st August, 2017 captioned ‘GJA on Anti- Corruption Crusade’.
The statement, ostensibly cautioning the media against using its platforms to attack indigenous businesses doing their best to promote Ghana’s social and economic development, taken on a face value, is a genuine expression of concern over a matter within GJA’s mandate. However, current developments in the local media suggest a more sinister possibility.
The statement appears to be targeted at the Multimedia Group and Manasseh Azure for the ongoing investigations into questionable contracts the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development (MLGRD) signed with subsidiaries of the Jospong Group. It is also apparent that there are contemporaneous efforts by some print and electronic media houses to undermine the ongoing scrutiny of these questionable contracts, an insidious effort for which the GJA statement, unfortunately, provided legitimacy and cover.
Based on these developments, it is our considered opinion that the GJA may knowingly or unknowingly be playing along with businesses which may be involved in allegations of wrongdoing and want to undermine the work of investigative journalists who are exposing alleged wrongdoing. As the GJA is aware, the media has a responsibility to hold state and non-state actors accountable.
This duty is not diminished when the state interfaces with non-state actors, especially the private sector in the award of public contracts. It is not out of place for the GJA to issue a statement aimed at enhancing the standards of media practice.
However, a statement of this nature, broadly castigating journalists for performing their function under Ghana’s 1992 Constitution, is highly invidious and capable of undermining the hard work of Investigative Journalists and media houses working tirelessly to uncover the several acts of grand corruption that has engulfed the country and threatening to delegitimize the state.
If the GJA is genuinely concerned with unethical practices in investigative journalism, then we strongly recommend that it invests in building the professional capacity of investigative journalists and work with the National Media Commission (NMC) to enforce sanctions against journalists who flout the ethical rules.
At the minimum, the GJA must not impede the work of investigative journalists, even if it is unable or unwilling to advance the cause of investigative journalism and its tiny band of practitioners.