Apau Report Tainted


A search at the High Court Registry in Accra has revealed that the Attorney General’s (AG’s) Department flagrantly abused the due diligence processes leading to the award of GH¢51.2 million to Alfred Agbesi Woyome, the supposed NDC financier.

Mr Woyome’s case appears to have resurrected because a leaked report by the just-ended Judgement Debt Commission, headed by the newly-appointed Supreme Court judge, Justice Yaw Apau, indicted the trial judge, I.O. Tanko Amadu of awarding the whopping amount of money without due care.

The Judgement Debt Commission report, yet to be released officially, is mired in controversy, with accusations that the sole commissioner did a shoddy job but subsequently received promotion to the Supreme Court.

Results of an application for search in the ‘Woyome versus AG’ case obtained by DAILY GUIDE showed that all the directives of Justice Tanko Amadu were not adhered to by the AG in settling Woyome’s supposed controversial judgement debt.

Search Results
On whether or not a Certificate of Judgement was issued in compliance with Section 15 of the State Proceedings Act (1998) Act 555 for service on the defendant in respect of the amount of GH¢17,094,493.53 as ordered by the trial judge, the registry replied, ‘No.’

The results showed that the order for an undertaking to be extracted from Mr Woyome and filed in the court as ordered was never done and the order for a stay of execution of the payment of GH¢34,188,987.06 as ordered by Justice Tanko Amadu on September 2010 was also never varied by the trial court or any other court.

Furthermore, the search showed that there was no order by a pre-trial judge for the payment of any other sum to Mr Woyome, apart from the order for the payment of GH¢17,094,493.53 which was done conditionally.

It said there was no Certificate of Judgement issued for the payment of the balance of GH¢34,188,987.06 to Mr Woyome and there was also no payment of money in the suit made to the court for tax purposes.

The search finally said Mr Woyome did not pay tax on the judgement debt.

Disrespect For Court Order
The AG’s Department, led by then Minister Betty Mould-Iddrisu and her deputy Ebo Barton-Odro, acted contrary to all the specific orders of the trial judge.

In spite of the judge’s efforts, the leaked sole commissioner’s report appears to have indicted him in the whole Woyome matter.

A copy of the report of the commission tasked to look into the payment of various judgement debts by the state reportedly raised serious issues about the basis and propriety to award and order the payment of judgement debt to Woyome, who thumps his chest as NDC bankroller.

Woyome claimed that the state owed him for job done in the stadia refurbishment for CAN 2008 tournament. The sole commissioner rubbished the claim, indicting the trial judge for doing a shoddy job as well as Mrs Mould-Iddrisu.

Notorious Case
It said ‘this Commission finds as a fact that there was no basis for the payment of the sum of over GH¢51 million to the plaintiff, Alfred Agbesi Woyome,’ describing the case as ‘the most notorious of all judgement debt cases that this commission was tasked to look into.’

This, the report said, was because ‘He was not entitled to any such payment as the Economic and Organised Crime Office (EOCO) rightly found and stated in its interim report dated February 1, 2012.’

AG’s Application
According to the document, in granting a stay of execution on September 6, 2010 which the Attorney-General applied for, Justice Tanko Amadu had ordered that only GH¢17,094,493.53 out of the total sum of GH¢51,283,480.59 be paid to Woyome.

The trial judge went further to direct that an undertaking be extracted from Woyome as a condition precedent to the partial payment so that should he lose the final case, he would refund the sum together with all accumulated interests and costs following any future judicial event.

The trial judge unequivocally ordered a stay of execution of the balance of GH¢34,188,987.06 which Betty was not obliged to pay until the fresh case filed by the same Attorney-General was concluded.

‘It is therefore obviously inaccurate as the Commission’s leaked report is suggesting that it was the trial judge who ordered the payment of the whopping total sum of GH¢51,283,480.59,’ a court document claimed.

By William Yaw Owusu


More General News »


Comments:
This article has 0 comment, leave your comment.

Comments