Justice Kpegah wants live telecast of face off with Akufo-Addo

Justice Francis KpegahJustice Francis KpegahRetired Supreme Court judge, Mr Justice Francis Yaonasu Kpegah, has indicated he will officially write to the Chief Justice to request for a live telecast of court proceedings of the case in which he is challenging the credentials of Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo as a lawyer.

According to him, the case is of national interest and must be accorded all the necessary privileges, just like the election petition case.

In an interview with Accra based radio station, Citi FM and quoted by Citifmonline.com, Justice Kpegah said “I will insist it should be at the Supreme Court for open telecast hearing. I will consult my lawyers and let them write to the Chief Justice but I personally, intend to ask for it”.

“This is the first major case of a professional being told that he is not qualified as he claims. It’s not for the bar alone. This is very important nationally, that no non-qualified professional should hide within the grounds of his people and be practicing illegally,” he said.

It would be recalled that when the case in which Justice Kpegah is questioning the credentials of Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo as a lawyer was called at the Fast Track High Court Tuesday, one Mr David Djantuh, who said he was representing Justice Kpegah, attributed the plaintiff’s absence to ill health.

As if that was not enough, in an unsuccessful attempt to make a case for the plaintiff, Mr Djantuh told the court that the defendant (Akufo-Addo) had not filed any conditional appearance, for which reason he had not appeared properly before the court.

He proceeded to ask for a date at the convenience of the court for the hearing to begin.

But the Presiding Judge, Ms Justice Cecilia H. Sowah, had a contrary opinion.

She asked to see the brief that indicated that Mr Djantuh was representing the plaintiff, but he failed to produce one.

“Are you representing him as counsel? Have you filed your brief?” she queried, and expressed surprise that counsel had gone to court empty-handed.

Notwithstanding the concern raised by the presiding judge, Mr Djantuh stood his ground and still asked for a date.

The hearing was later adjourned to May 2, 2013.

Meanwhile in a press statement later on Tuesday, Justice Kpegah said, “…my not being in Court personally today should not offer any premature sanctuary of comfort to the defendant Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo”.

“I was unable to attend Court today [Tuesday April 23], in person due to ill health”, he explained.
 
“However, I was duly represented by Mr. Djantuh, a practising Barrister and Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Ghana”.
 
“I am still going to let the whole world know that Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo Addo is impersonating W.A.D. Akufo-Addo who is number 1190 on the roll of lawyers in Ghana”, he insisted.
 
He said: “I have filed my motion on notice for summary judgment and a 76 paragraph supporting affidavit and the court will be moved by me on the 9th of May 2013. My claim is that I have an iron cast and unimpeachable claim against the defendant, Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo who has no defence in law and in fact to the case against him that his name is not on the roll of lawyers in Ghana and that he is impersonating one W.A.D. Akufo-Addo who is number 1190 on the Roll of Lawyers in Ghana”.

“He should explain how his solicitors, Davies and Davies forged the annexed exhibit (NADA 1) to his original application to strike out the action against him”, wondering: “Is that why he has clandestinely changed his fraudulent solicitors with Godfred Yeboah Dame without filing a notice of change of solicitors?”
 
“I will go on with my case against him no matter what tricks they employ. I am undeterred and will proceed with my case against the defendant, Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo who is not on the roll of lawyers in Ghana and is therefore not competent to practice law in Ghana”, he insisted.

“Today…, a Judicial sacrilege was occasioned when the presiding Judge at the Fast Track High Court granted audience to Lawyer Godfred Yeboah Dame to move an ill conceived application to strike out the case in the matter involving my humble self Justice Francis Yaonasu Kpegah as plaintiff and NANA ADDO DANKWA AKUFO -ADDO as Defendant, SUIT NO. AP 94/2013”.
 
He stated that: “The presiding Judge should not have granted audience to Lawyer Godfred Yeboah Dame since he did not enter appearance to the writ of summons for and on behalf of the Defendant NANA ADDO DANKWA AKUFO-ADDO and is therefore not known to the Honourable Court and the parties to the instant suit”.
 
He asserted that: “The only way he could have been granted audience by the Honourable Court is if he had filed a notice of change of solicitors”, adding that: “My Search at the Registry of the Fast Track High Court indicates that there was no Notice of change of solicitors filed at the Registry of the Fast Track High Court. This was also confirmed by the Registrar of the Fast Track High Court, Mr Gyimah”.

He said the application by Nana Akufo Addo to strike out the action as “frivolous, vexatious, abuse of the process and disclosing no reasonable Cause of Action under order 11 rule 18(a),(b), (c), (d) and the inherent Jurisdiction of the Court  brought by the Defendant  is misplaced and erroneous in law for the simple reason that order 11 rule 18  of CI 47 deals with ‘striking out pleadings’  and not  ‘striking out action’”.
 
He noted that: “Order 11 rule 18 (1) provides that   ‘the court may at any stage of the proceedings order any pleading or anything in any pleading struck out on the grounds that: (a) it discloses no reasonable cause of action or defence; or (b) it is scandalous , frivolous or vexatious; or (c) it may prejudice, embarrass, or delay the fair trial of the action; or (d) it is otherwise an abuse of the process of the Court, and may order the action to be stayed or dismissed or Judgment to be entered accordingly”.
 
“Clearly the application by the defendant to strike out the action is unknown to the rules of Court the circumstances”, he mocked.
 
He insisted that: “The defendant through his solicitors Davies and Davies entered a normal appearance to the writ and therefore cannot move to set aside the writ”.
 
According to him, “Having realised their monumental procedural error of not entering a conditional appearance which would have clothed them with an unfettered right to move to set aside the writ, they have attempted to reinvent the rules of court by attempting to strike out the action which is improper and rather the real abuses of the court process”.
 
He dared Nana Akufo Addo to stand up to the Court challenge if he believed he had done no wrong.
 
“If Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo- Addo has nothing to hide why is he conniving with agents and cronies to strike out the action as frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of the court process?” He asked.
 
“He should defend himself if he still has any bit of integrity left in him. How can a man who wants to be president of this dear Country of ours have so many question marks all over him? He should pray to God for the strength he apparently lacks to confront his personal demons squarely”.
 
“I am verily informed and verily believe same to be true by my representative whom I gave a power of attorney to represent me in court today that the court has adjourned the hearing of the application of the defendant to strike out the action for the 2nd of may 2013”.
 
He also said the Presiding Judge cannot “grant audience to Lawyer Godfred Yeboah Dame since he did not enter appearance to the writ of Summons and did not also file A Notice for a Change of Solicitors. The Presiding Judge should not compromise the Rules of Court and the hard won image of the Judiciary to further the parochial interest of Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo”.
 
Justice Kpegah also claimed his Counsel was abused in Court on Tuesday when the case was called for the first time.
 
“My Representative Mr Djantuh was today manhandled and shouted down in court by some senior lawyers who are apparently sympathetic to Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo. He was violently pushed and shoved by these disgraceful elements. I am disgusted that this is how low some persons in the legal fraternity have sunk. They have effectively abandoned all the ethics required of members of this hitherto honourable profession. By their conduct, it is clear that some gangsters have found their way into the legal community and must be smoked out”.

By Graphic.com.gh

Related story

Kpegah fails to show up in court


Newer news items:

Older news items:


Comments