Fireworks At Judgement Debt Hearing
The parked Gallopers
There were fireworks at the Commission of Enquiry investigating the payment of judgement debts when the Managing Director of Africa Automobile Limited (AAL) testified about purported debts owed his company by the government for services rendered.
Documents available to the Commission indicated that the debts owed by the government to AAL stood at GH¢145,917.76 but the debts ballooned to GH¢8.3 million in 2010 as judgement debt due to compound interest on it.
Furthermore, in the 2006 audited report of the company, the amount owed by all AAL debtors including the Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs), stood at GH¢96,823.51 but when the company sued in 2006 it claimed that the total debt owed by the MMDAs was GH¢145,917.76.
Unfortunately, when AAL filed the suit against the government, the then Attorney General and Minister of Justice did not contest the matter, compelling the Commercial Court to enter a default judgement in favour of the claimant.
Yesterday when Mohammed Hijaazi, Executive Chairman and Managing Director of AAL, appeared before the Commission, he confirmed that AAL had indeed been paid GH¢8.3 million as judgement debt and justified the payments.
He said AAL provided services as well as supplied spare parts to 17 MDAs from 1994/95 to 2010 but the government failed to pay for them and that compelled them to go to court.
He said that apart from the 4% compound interest charged, the MDAs had signed an agreement that AAL reserved the right to adjust the interest, charge 5% for what he called ‘loss of opportunity’ as well as charge 1% administrative cost.
Sole Commissioner Justice Yaw Apau as a result, requested Mr. Hijaazi to provide the agreement signed by each MDA with AAL, which he promised to submit.
Counsel for the Commission, Dometi Kofi Sorkpor, then asked Mr. Hijaazi whether he paid GH¢6.1 million as tax on the GH¢ 8.3 million collected as indicated by the Ghana Revenue Authority, but the witness said he did not intend to pay.
‘The interest was a loss that the creditor suffered at the hands of the MDAs and I would not declare that as a loss. I have not and I would not. It was a loss and not profit,’ he insisted.
When the Commission’s counsel asked him whether AAL sued for loss of business, witness said, ‘No, I haven’t. In fact, you have reminded me now and I am going to do that.’
‘For 15 years, we have been reminding the MDAs of their contractual obligation but they did not, and here I am today trying to make my claims and I am being branded a criminal,’ Mr. Hijaazi lamented.
Sole Commissioner Justice Yaw Apau then told him that ‘nobody is imputing criminality on your part or your company,’ adding that ‘We are only interested in how GH¢145,917.76 became GH¢8.3 millionthat is what we are looking for.’
Earlier, Roland Modey, Acting Chief Director of the Ministry of Employment and Labour Relations, flanked by Paul Opoku, a lawyer at the ministry, testified in the case and said the funds were lodged in the ministry’s account to pay the AAL, even though the ministry was not indebted to the company.
He said the GH¢8.3 million judgement debt was astronomical and added that there should have been simple interest instead of the compound interest charged.
By William Yaw Owusu
This article has 0 comment, leave your comment.